Real-World Challenges of Managing Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in a Developing Country.

PURPOSE: To highlight challenges and cancer care disparities in patients of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma management in resource-constrained settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 738 patients from 12 public and private sector hematology-oncology centers across Pakistan. Patients were divided into limited-resource and enhanced-resource settings as per national diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) guidelines. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 47 years (range, 14-89). Male:female ratio was 2.5:1. Majority of the patients (69.3%) were treated in limited-resource settings. Computed tomography was used as a staging modality in 442 (60%) patients. Limited-stage DLBCL was present in 13.5% of patients, while 86.3% had advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. First-line regimens included rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone in 56% and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone in 34% of patients, while 10% of patients received palliative regimens upfront. Of evaluable data, complete remission was documented in 299 (74.4%) patients, 39 (9.8%) had partial response and 63 (13.5%) had progressive disease. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) status were not available for 345 (46.8%) patients at the time of data collection. Overall study cohort had a median follow-up of 2.2 years with a median OS of 3.6 years (95% CI, 3.1 to 4.1), median DFS of 3.1 years (95% CI, 2.6 to 3.6), and a 5-year OS of 40% and DFS of 36%. CONCLUSION: Patients from low- and middle-income countries present at an earlier age and have more advanced disease. Patients were frequently lost to follow-up, and record keeping was inadequate more so in patients treated in limited-resource settings. There is a need to establish a national lymphoma registry, improve record keeping, and standardize treatments to ensure improvement in treatment outcomes.

Megakaryocytic Clustering in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Can it be a Predictor of Clinical Outcome?

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcome in patients of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with and without megakaryocytic clustering. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparative study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Pathology Department and CML Clinic Oncology Department, King Edward Medical University from March 2018 to March 2019.  Methodology: Ninety-four patients diagnosed with chronic phase of CML were included. Complete record of complete blood count, splenomegaly, findings of bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy was noted. Bone marrow trephine biopsy was reviewed for megakaryocytic clustering. Sokal scoring was done; and follow-up data for clinical outcome, i.e complete hematological response (CHR) at 3 months and major molecular response (MMR) at 6 months and 1 year (as per Institute's protocol) was obtained. All the data were analysed using SPSS version 25. RESULTS: Megakaryocytic clustering was present in 57 (60.6%) patients and absent in 37 (39.4%). In patients with megakaryocytic clustering, CHR was absent in 12 (21.1%), MMR at 6 months was absent in 21 (36.8%) and MMR at 1 year was absent in 25 (43.9%) patients. In patients without megakaryocytic clustering, absent CHR, MMR at 6 months and MMR at 1 year were seen in 1 (2.7%), 2 (5.4%) and 2 (5.4%x), respectively. The correlation of megakaryocytic clustering and high sokal score was found to be statistically significant with a p-value <0.001. CONCLUSION: Patients with megakaryocytic clustering have poor clinical outcome as indicated by their sokal score, absent CHR, MMR at 6 months and 1 year. Key Words: Chronic myeloid leukaemia, Megakaryocytic clustering, Complete haematological response, Major molecular response, Cytogenetic response.